<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/blog/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>
<feed
   xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/feeds/atom.xml" rel="self" title="Pennsylvania Highways Blog" type="application/x.atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/"                        rel="alternate"    title="Pennsylvania Highways Blog" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="Pennsylvania Highways Blog" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title type="html">Pennsylvania Highways Blog</title>
    <subtitle type="html">Covering all things related to the highway system of the Commonwealth.</subtitle>
    <icon>http://www.pahighways.com/graphics/downloads/pahwyssmall.gif</icon>
    <id>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/</id>
    <updated>2010-06-22T03:54:36Z</updated>
    <generator uri="http://www.s9y.org/" version="0.9.1">Serendipity 0.9.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    
<entry>
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/43-2010-SEPA-Meet-Notes.html" rel="alternate" title="2010 SEPA Meet Notes" />
    <author>
        <name>Webmaster</name>
        <email>nospam@example.com</email>
    </author>

    <published>2010-06-20T03:47:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-06-22T03:54:36Z</updated>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=43</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=43</wfw:commentRss>
                        <category scheme="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/categories/4-Events" label="Events" term="Events" />
    <id>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/43-guid.html</id>
    <title type="html">2010 SEPA Meet Notes</title>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
After a six year hiatus, the second second SEPA Road Enthusiast Meet was held today.  I'd like to thank all who attended and for making the trip for the second meet in the Greater Philadelphia area.<br />
<br />
The meet began as usual at 12 PM at the Sly Fox Brewhouse &amp; Eatery, home of the Route 113 Indian Pale Ale, on what else, PA 113 in Phoenixville.  Some of the attendees did partake of the Route 113 IPA, or as PennDOT would call it the SR 0113 Indian Pale Ale, which just might be the official beverage for road enthusiasts over the age of 21.  The food was good as well as the conversations.  Many of the attendees brought road-related materials to peruse as well as to keep:  Adam Froehlig - various state official maps from Virginia, West Virginia, and Pennsylvania; Doug Kerr - I-87 Northway maps; H. B. Elkins - goodie bags full of Kentucky maps and other Kentucky Transportation Cabinet paraphernalia and I brought a planning map for the Keystone State's Interstate System from the early 1960s which I had acquired from eBay in the mid-2000s.<br />
<br />
After lunch, we hopped in our cars and followed PA 23 to the first stop which was at the Philadelphia Traffic Management Center in the PennDOT District 6-0 headquarters in King of Prussia.  Thanks go to Len Pundt, who worked for PennDOT, who helped arrange the tour.  The TMC, which was called the Traffic Control Center when I toured it in 2004, has been upgraded and now includes two video walls with feeds from traffic cameras around the Philadelphia area as well as content from the Internet and TV.  In what seems to have become a constant in Pennsylvania meets that involve visiting a  traffic management center, we were witness to an accident on the Platt Bridge tying up traffic.<br />
<br />
Continuing east on PA 23, we stopped at the Schuylkill Parkway overpass just north of Bridgeport.  Len described what was to have happened with that project, which would have been the eastern end of the "Goat Path" Expressway.  Len gave us some background on this abandoned project, which is now used as a driver training course for the State Police.  He also explained how PennDOT got into the funding predicament which led to it cancelling this and numerous other expressway projects around the Commonwealth in 1977.  One of the points he made was that cancelling these projects did initially save money, but now there is no way to build these to solve the traffic issues of the 21st Century because right-of-way acquisition alone would be astronomically high to carve these highways through dense urbanized areas.<br />
<br />
We bid Len adieu and took I-276/PA Turnpike eastbound to PA 309 northbound to observe some of the rehabilitation project that has been taking place since 2003.  As soon as joining the Fort Washington Expressway, the attendees could see a vastly improved expressway from the one that had been serving commuters since it was built as a new route for US 309.  We encountered the last remaining section to be undergoing rehabilitation heading north and exited in the construction zone at Norristown Road to go west to Bethlehem Pike which was the pre-expressway route of US 309.  Traveling north to Cedar Hill Road, which crosses over PA 309, allowed us to view the progress on reconstruction of the northern-most segment.<br />
<br />
After stopping at the overpass to see the work, we continued northeast to PA 63 then turned northwest to go to the intersection with US 202 to see the progress on the US 202 Parkway project.  A new alignment is underway at PA 63 and work is taking place south along the current alignment.  We passed some of the work along US 202 as we headed back to the Sly Fox Brewhouse &amp; Eatery where we said our farewells, and headed to our respective destinations.        </div>
    </content>
<dc:subject>PA 23</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PA 309</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PennDOT</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Philadelphia</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Road Enthusiast Meet</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>US 202</dc:subject>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/42-Welcome-to-Pennsylvania...NOW-PAY-UP!.html" rel="alternate" title="Welcome to Pennsylvania...NOW PAY UP!" />
    <author>
        <name>Webmaster</name>
        <email>nospam@example.com</email>
    </author>

    <published>2010-05-07T04:23:00Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-12T08:12:19Z</updated>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=42</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=42</wfw:commentRss>
                        <category scheme="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/categories/2-News" label="News" term="News" />
    <id>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/42-guid.html</id>
    <title type="html">Welcome to Pennsylvania...NOW PAY UP!</title>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
Since the Federal Highway Administration vetoed the Commonwealth's plan to put tolls on Interstate 80 to help fill the potholes in PennDOT's budget, ideas on how to accomplish that feat in a different manner have been flying fast and furious.  The daunting task of finding $472 million was taken up by three state representatives:  Bill Kortz of Allegheny County, Michael O'Brien of Philadelphia, and Scott Conklin of Centre County.  Their idea?  Tolls!<br />
<br />
Their idea, officially called Special Session House Bill 2 or "Gateway Tolling for Transportation Independence Today" would have toll plazas constructed at the state lines on I-78, I-79, I-80, I-81, I-84, I-90, and I-95 which would charge traffic entering and exiting anywhere between $1 for passenger vehicles to $5 for trucks.  Residents near the borders could buy a book of tickets at a reduced price which would offer them a lower toll, but trucking companies based within Pennsylvania would be entirely exempt from paying.  The toll booths would be manned by PennDOT, not PTC, employees and would offer coin-drop baskets as well as E-ZPass gantries equipped with video cameras to capture violator's license plates who would receive a bill in the mail.<br />
<br />
These tolls would basically amount to a "user fee" paid by those who drive said Interstates, for maintenance of said Interstate.  Tolling currently free Interstates whose construction was funded 90% by the federal government is allowed to provide for maintenance, and only maintenance.  The plan to toll Interstate 80 would have siphoned money off for other transportation-related projects, which is not allowed.  Representative Coklin estimates that between $235 million and $300 million a year could be raised for the Department of Transportation.   <br />
<br />
The proposal faces two roadblocks:  passage by the special session of the Legislature and a stamp of approval from the Federal Highway Administration.  Since the proposal would need their approval, the process for implementation could take several years, so the idea might not provide immediate results.<br />
<br />
So "Pennsylvania Welcomes You"...for free...for now.<br />
<br />
<img src="http://www.pahighways.com/graphics/blog/welcomesign.jpg" alt="Pennsylvania Welcomes Your Toll Dollars" /><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10126/1056010-147.stm" target="_blank">New Plan to Toll Roads Proposed</a> - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette<br />
        </div>
    </content>
<dc:subject>E-ZPass</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Highway Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-78</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-79</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-80</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-81</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-84</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-90</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-95</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PennDOT</dc:subject>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/41-For-Whom-the-Road-Will-Not-Toll.html" rel="alternate" title="For Whom the Road Will Not Toll" />
    <author>
        <name>Webmaster</name>
        <email>nospam@example.com</email>
    </author>

    <published>2010-04-08T01:45:28Z</published>
    <updated>2010-05-12T08:02:50Z</updated>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=41</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=41</wfw:commentRss>
                        <category scheme="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/categories/2-News" label="News" term="News" />
    <id>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/41-guid.html</id>
    <title type="html">For Whom the Road Will Not Toll</title>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<img src="http://www.pahighways.com/graphics/blog/I80-keystonetollway.gif" alt="I-80/Keystone Tollway" /><br />
<br />
Interstate 80 turns the big 4-0 this year, and for most of those 40 years, people have been trying to undo what was done.  President Dwight D. Eisenhower signed the Federal Highway Act of 1956 that kicked off the building of the Interstates, a system of free, limited-access highways crisscrossing the United States at a time when building toll roads were all the rage.  Pennsylvania was the first to build a long-distance toll road and other states followed our lead, thus creating a small-scale Interstate system from the Northeast to the Mid-Atlantic and through the Midwest by the time the Act passed in 1956.<br />
<br />
Once the mainline Turnpike was finished and the Northeast Extension nearing completion, the Turnpike Commission looked to building other extensions.  However, Ike stole the PTC's thunder by putting pen to paper, so all of these proposed extensions became the blueprint for the Department of Highways to lay out the Commonwealth's Interstate System.  Without Eisenhower witnessing the German Autobahns first-hand as Supreme Commander of the Allied Forces in World War II, what we now now know as Interstate 80 would have been constructed as the Turnpike Commission's "Keystone Shortway" and would have basically been a Xerox copy of the Turnpike.  So the idea of a toll road slicing right through the middle of Penn's Woods is not a new idea...it's just made to seem that way.<br />
<br />
The exact day of Interstate 80's completion is marked as September 21, 1970.  Once completed, it was obvious that it offered a shortcut between New York City and Chicago versus going north on the New York State Thruway or south on the Turnpike.  Of course it wouldn't be fair for Pennsylvanians to pay the <b><u>entire</u></b> cost of maintenance on the Interstate when most of the users were from out of state and just passing through.  The first idea to change the Keystone Shortway into the Keystone Tollway came during the Milton Shapp administration in the early 1970s, but nothing happened.<br />
<br />
The plan was resurrected in the 1980s when the Turnpike Expansion bill known as Act 61 was signed, again nothing happened.  In the late 1990s, Representative Bud Shuster (yes, Mr. Interstate 99) resurrected the idea because he felt repairs were due.  The proposal was originally rejected by Governor Tom Ridge but in April 1999 he went back; however, again nothing happened as he was tapped to be the first Secretary of Homeland Security.<br />
<br />
The idea resurfaced in 2004 when Department of Transportation Secretary Allen Biehler told the state House Appropriations Committee that a series of toll plazas could be built approximately every 30 miles along the Interstate.  He also said that the feasibility study had been going on for several months and would take another two to complete.  PennDOT would need permission from the Federal Highway Administration to charge tolls since federal money was used to build the Interstate.  There is also the question of whether the PTC or PennDOT would be in charge of operations and maintenance.  Tolls are one option for raising needed funds to pay for maintenance and possibly widening it to six lanes in sections, especially from Interstate 81 to the Delaware River.  A year later on March 8, 2005, Secretary Biehler told the Senate Appropriations Committee that costs of building toll booths, maintenance facilities, and police stations would exceed $650 million and take years to complete.  A PennDOT study stated it would be feasible to charge tolls over the long run but it would take decades to break even and pay off the debt.  Biehler said that "it wasn't a wise move to institute tolls at this time."  State Senator J. Barry Stout of Washington County said he was "a little shocked to see the final conclusion."  As the minority chairman of the Senate Transportation Committee, he endorsed the idea of putting ten toll booths, with a $2.50 fare at each, on the Interstate from Ohio to New Jersey.  Again, nothing would happen.<br />
<br />
The idea seemed to really start gaining traction in 2007 when Act 44 was passed.  Under the terms, the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission would take over operation of the Interstate and construct ten toll plazas at 30 mile intervals from Ohio to New Jersey.  The estimated $946 million/year collected from them as well as increased fare rates on the mainline Turnpike would go to fund highway and bridge repairs across the state.  Officials continued to push ahead by announcing that the PTC would spend more than $1 billion on improvements to the Interstate over the next few years which would include repairing bridges, adding truck climbing lanes, upgrading pavement, and extending on-ramps.<br />
<br />
On October 16, 2007, the Department of Transportation and Turnpike Commission entered into a 50-year lease agreement for Interstate 80.  As part of Act 44, the two agencies filed a formal application with the Federal Highway Administration on October 13 seeking approval to implement tolls.  However, in a letter dated October 17 to Transportation Secretary Allen Biehler and PTC CEO Joseph Brimmeier, chief counsel and acting deputy administrator of the FHWA, James D. Ray stated, "As should be clear, FHWA has not granted Pennsylvania the authority to toll I-80.  In fact, now that we have received a formal application, we will conduct a thorough analysis of the application's merits based on the statutory criteria and determine if the selection of I-80 in Pennsylvania for one of three nationwide tolling pilot authorities is appropriate.  The approval of any application under this program is a discretionary decision.  We will take into account a variety of factors, including, but not limited to, actual or expected competition from other interstate facilities."  On the night of Thursday, November 9, Congress eliminated the amendment to a transportation appropriations bill that would have forbidden putting tolls on free Interstates at the request of Governor Rendell, Democrats, and Senator Arlen Specter.  The two Representatives from along the corridor who added the rider cried foul.<br />
<br />
On July 14, 2008, the Turnpike Commission announced its planned $2.5 billion upgrades to the Interstate in the first decade of ownership.  The upgrades include building two new interchanges to connect the Interstate with Interstate 99, replacing or resurfacing about 80 percent of the 311 miles, and replacing 60 original bridges.  On August 6, the PTC announced their toll collecting would be much different than that on their other expressways.  Instead of traditional toll plazas, Interstate 80 would be the first all electronic toll road in Pennsylvania utilizing E-ZPass at nine gantries across the state each costing $60 million to build.  Those without a transponder would get their license plate photographed and be mailed a bill for their toll plus a $1 processing fee, in both cases much like the 407 ETR outside of Toronto, Ontario.  Those with transponders would also get a free pass at the first gantry, roughly equating to a 60 mile free ride, then be charged $2.70 at the second and each gantry after wards.  This offer would not be extended to most commercial vehicles, including 18-wheelers that account for up to 30% of traffic on the Interstate, although regular users would be eligible for volume discounts.<br />
<br />
Feeling confident and having all their cars in a row, the state resubmitted the plan on July 22, 2008 and they expected the decision would take two or three months to decided on phase one approval for tolling Interstate 80.  Two months later, the decision handed down was against tolling 80, so yet again nothing would happen.  The story might have ended there, but it didn't as the Commonwealth submitted the exact plan a second time in late October 2009.  It came as no surprise to this blogger that on April 6, 2010, yet again the application was rejected.  However, this time it seems the Federal Highway Administration finally drove a stake through the plan's heart as Governor Rendell announced that day that it will not be resubmitted.  Therefore, it can finally be said that after 40 years, nothing will happen.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10096/1048294-100.stm" target="_blank">Federal Officials Again Reject Tolling I-80</a> - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette        </div>
    </content>
<dc:subject>Act 44</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Federal Highway Administration</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>I-80</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PennDOT</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>PTC</dc:subject>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/40-Route-2.0-Meets-Web-2.0-Again.html" rel="alternate" title="Route 2.0 Meets Web 2.0 Again" />
    <author>
        <name>Webmaster</name>
        <email>nospam@example.com</email>
    </author>

    <published>2010-03-13T01:21:40Z</published>
    <updated>2010-04-09T03:15:19Z</updated>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=40</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom1.0&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=40</wfw:commentRss>
                        <category scheme="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/categories/3-Announcements" label="Announcements" term="Announcements" />
    <id>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/40-guid.html</id>
    <title type="html">Route 2.0 Meets Web 2.0 Again</title>
    <content type="xhtml" xml:base="http://www.pahighways.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
Last April, I created new avenues of communication with three of the most used social networking sites on the Internet today.  So far the Twitter account has 678 followers, the Facebook page has 282 fans, and the YouTube channel has 14 subscribers.  Today I created a Pennsylvania Highways presence on three more social networking platforms that will hopefully have the same success as the first three.<br />
<br />
<b><u>Vimeo</u></b><br />
Everyone knows YouTube, but not everyone has heard of this service.  The difference between the two services is that this one provides high bit rates, resolutions, and full HD support.  It has gained a reputation for catering to an artistic crowd because of these attributes, so I will use this to showcase special videos.  However, I still have the problem as with the YouTube Channel in that I need a new, modern camcorder.  Basically this idea is still on the burner as well.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.vimeo.com/pahighways" target="_blank">http://www.vimeo.com/pahighways</a><br />
<br />
<b><u>Delicious</u></b><br />
Social networking has been around much longer with such sites as this which has been around since 2003 when it was known as Del.icio.us.  Social bookmarking is one facet where people can share items just like on any other platform.  Up to now, I had been putting any road-related news articles on the Facebook fan page so this will take over that job and make the Facebook page a lot cleaner.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://delicious.com/pahighways" target="_blank">http://delicious.com/pahighways</a><br />
<br />
<b><u>Tumblr</b></u><br />
A buzzword that has been flying around the Web 2.0 world is microblogging.  It is just a short-form version of blogging with content that is shorter.  Twitter is an example of microblogging, but it has one drawback:  140 character limit on entries.  Twitter is a good service for spreading the word about traffic or construction, but this service allows for entries that are not limited to a specific number of characters.  The one drawback of this blog is that it isn't accessible from mobile devices.  Tumblr is, which is good for a website whose subject is roads and travel so this will be the mobile blogging platform for Pennsylvania Highways to provide a channel for field reporting.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://pahighways.tumblr.com/" target="_blank">http://pahighways.tumblr.com/</a>        </div>
    </content>
<dc:subject>Delicious</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Social Networking</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Tumblr</dc:subject>
<dc:subject>Vimeo</dc:subject>
</entry>
</feed>