<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Pennsylvania Highways Blog Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/</link>
    <description>Comments from Covering all things related to the highway system of the Commonwealth.</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    
    <generator>Serendipity 0.9.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 23:19:56 GMT</pubDate>

    
<item>
    <title>Eric: LET'S GO...PENNSYLVANIA!</title>
    <link>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/26-LETS-GO...PENNSYLVANIA!.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/26-LETS-GO...PENNSYLVANIA!.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=26</wfw:comment>
    <author>nospam@example.com (Eric)</author>
    <content:encoded>
May the Flyers be the receivers of great victory in this series and that Sid &quot;The Kid&quot; Crosby waits like every other player to earn his victory.    </content:encoded>
                
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 23:29:19 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/26-guid.html#c61</guid>
    </item>
<item>
    <title>J_Treehorn: Extending I-376 For All the Wrong Reasons</title>
    <link>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/2-Extending-I-376-For-All-the-Wrong-Reasons.html</link>
<category></category>    <comments>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/2-Extending-I-376-For-All-the-Wrong-Reasons.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.pahighways.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=2</wfw:comment>
    <author>nospam@example.com (J_Treehorn)</author>
    <content:encoded>
As I'm not sure how these blog things work, I'll type anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
While I have to agree with the points made above, I still have to raise my hand in support of the 376 extension.  While I understand the history of the whole 79/279 switcheroo thing, I think that when they decided to switch I-79 to where it is now, they should have just extended 376 along the whole Penn-Lincoln Parkway then (at least to 79).&lt;br /&gt;
Put simply, it is a contiguous highway from Monroeville to New Castle.  While there are many route numbers switch roads; the clusterf*ck of numbers for a unified road is pretty ridiculous. I do agree with your comments about the &quot;Interstate Fairy&quot; and &quot;related&quot; econmic stimulus...  This just strikes me as something that makes sense to do (or should've been done long ago)&lt;br /&gt;
Ironicly, since the FUTURE 376 signs are already up, and the politicians have said the &quot;future&quot; to be 2009, I'm willing to bet that the interchange with Rt. 60 &amp;amp; 22-30 won't see a meaningful upgrade/reconfiguration for many years after that.    </content:encoded>
                
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 20:26:54 -0700</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pahighways.com/blog/archives/2-guid.html#c1</guid>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>
